sovereign risk

Monitoring Risk While Pursuing High Returns: Who Pays the Piper?

“Rating biases affect how we think about methodologies,” said Elliot Noma, Managing Director at Garrett Asset Management. “A rating agency paid by the issuer will likely give the firm the benefit of the doubt,” whereas a rating agency paid by the investor might want to more stringently evaluate the firm. “Both evaluations have the risk of error” due to bias. Noma was speaking about evaluation of credit risk as part of the webinar presentation “Monitoring Risk While Pursuing High Returns” on March 7, 2013 organized by the Global Association of Risk Professionals (GARP).  He began by dividing non-structured credit exposure […]

The Fed, Foreign Banks and Basel III: Part 2. Capital Concerns

“Some of the rules are in direct conflict,” said Peter Went, VP, Banking Risk Management Programs, GARP. He was the second speaker at a webinar presented on February 14, 2013 organized by the Global Association of Risk Professionals (GARP) regarding regulatory reform of foreign banking operations (FBOs) in the United States and the implementation of the Basel III framework. The “conflict” refers to rules in the Dodd-Frank Act versus the globally agreed Basel III Accord’s guidelines. Both regulatory attempts apply the G-20 principles on financial regulation (Pittsburgh 2009 summit).  The US implementation of the Basel III framework differs from the […]

The Fed, Foreign Banks and Basel III: Part 1. A Long Hard Look

Foreign banking operations (FBOs) in the United States are about to face a whole new set of regulations that may dampen their enthusiasm for US-based operations, according to a February 14, 2013 webinar organized by the Global Association of Risk Professionals (GARP). “The Fed observed over time that US branches were increasingly used to fund the home office operations,” said Charles Horn, partner at Morrison Foerster, who was the first speaker at the panel. Other concerns of the Federal Reserve Board are the increased complexity of FBOs, and “the availability of home country financial resources for branch offices.” The goal, […]

US Implementation of Basel III. Part 2: The GPS for the Journey

On July 24, 2012, Peter Went, VP Banking Risk Management Programs at GARP, summarized the changing landscape of Basel III from a US perspective. First he outlined the deadlines and proposed changes; Part 1 of this posting covers these for the standardized approach. Financial institutions adhering to the advanced approach, Went said, must follow the Basel III counterparty credit risk rules. In some cases, correlations between asset values must be increased. A distinction will be made between securitization and resecuritization. [Ed. Note: To this, we say, “high time.” See, for example, Hull & White’s award-winning article in Financial Analysts Journal, […]

Zombie Banks Part 1. Tough Love

George A. Romero, the moviemaker who popularized the witchcraft legend of the “walking undead,” would likely be astonished to hear the term applied to real financial institutions, but “Zombie banks” does capture the concept well. On June 5, 2012, Yalman Onaran, author of “Zombie Banks: How Broken Banks and Debtor Nations Are Crippling the Global Economy,” and financial reporter at Bloomberg News, spoke at a panel convened by GARP (Global Association of Risk Professionals) to discuss the phenomenon of banks which exist to fulfill a regulatory purpose but are not in themselves economically viable. Onaran said the first response to […]